If you're recording your podcast at home, this is something that you should consider. The high quality of WAV files comes at a cost—larger file sizes.
These large files can affect your podcast budget and limit how listeners access your show. You might need to spend more money on your show to host and store larger WAV files. That means budgeting more for your podcast hosting app.
Plus, you'll have to pay closer attention to the size limits your hosting company sets on file uploads and downloads. Larger WAV files make them impractical to use with some streaming services and portable devices. This can limit how your audience can listen to and download your show on iTunes, social media, and other subscription platforms.
Some listeners prefer to download podcasts and listen to them on their devices at their leisure when offline. Larger file sizes can make downloading and storing your show a hassle, which could turn off listeners and make them tune out. Consider the content of your show, your podcast budget, and your audience.
While there is no cut and dry answer when comparing WAV vs MP3, if you understand the unique needs of your show, you can make a well-informed decision. If your content mostly involves people having conversations with some sound effects, MP3 will work just fine. WAV formats really make sense for music production. Because of their larger size, using WAV files for your podcast can get pricey when it comes to hosting. You may want to invest in WAV if you consider audio quality a top priority, and you have the budget.
You can't have a successful podcast without an audience. Pay attention to your branding and how your listeners consume your show. MP3 files are smaller, which makes them easier to download or stream, and guests can have greater access to your podcast across all of their devices and websites. The size of WAV files can put limitations on how your show is distributed, which in turn affects how many people you can reach. Compressed MP3 audio files let you store and distribute your show more easily.
But, you sacrifice audio quality lost in the compression algorithms. You can edit uncompressed WAV audio files more easily. They provide a much higher audio quality, but their size makes them difficult to store and stream.
Keep in mind that uncompressed audio files can always be compressed. You can record and edit the uncompressed WAV format, and then compress the file into MP3 format for easier distribution. If you do a lot of editing after you record audio, and you don't mind the loss in audio quality, you may want to look into downloading a program that converts WAV files to MP3 files. Like with AAC files, using WMA to record and distribute your podcast could cause hang-ups due to device and platform compatibility issues.
This file type is compressed but is still a lossless file type, as little quality is lost due to audio track compression. This file type gives you similar sound quality to a WAV file while taking up half the storage space. Both file types come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages.
You can reach your audience faster with MP3s because of the compressed file sizes. Meanwhile, WAV provides a higher level of sound quality preferred by many recording professionals. At the end of the day, it really depends on whether you will sacrifice sound quality for smaller files. The Riverside.
Well, there is a way of finding out. Next invert this in an audio editor and save it under a new name. Select this new wave and copy it. Paste this into the original file, and export the two files as a single mono WAV. This is what an MP3 throws away. Have a listen below… Here's the original Beats Original Beats MP3 Discarded Shocking, eh? Registered in England. Company registration number VAT no.
By using the Dawsons website you agree to our use of cookies to improve your experience and our services Close. If a MP3 is played out in a club, the stereo information is brought into the dual mono signal, and the digital noise is still there. If a WAV is played, the stereo information is brought into the mix as lossless quality. If a DJ set is full of WAVs, and then recorded, and then compressed to a MP3 format, the audio for the listener is better than fact MP3s have a higher distortion, with a flat 2 dimensional sound and WAVs have a higher quality coding.
Higher resolution, uncompressed sounds is what you get on a CD. Uncompressed audio is better. When you buy albums on CD, you are buying the highest quality mastered music. When you process audio during the recording process, higher quality files sound better. MP3s sound utterly awful compared to WAVs under those circumstances. That is a quick, easy test for anyone to hear.
When audio is digitally compressed as MP3, some high frequencies become exaggerated giving a false perception of fidelity. One downside of FLAC, especially in a production setting, is that not all software can play it. I use it for certain albums in my personal digital music collection where I want a more faithful reproduction than MP3. But for production I usually stick with. If you have the option, go with.
But if there are space constraints or you only have an MP3 version of something, as long as it's a high enough bitrate at least kpbs is ideal , most people can't tell the difference.
Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. What are the advantages of WAV vs. Ask Question. Asked 7 years, 1 month ago. Active 5 years, 6 months ago. Viewed k times. Improve this question. See also: sound. And also sound.
0コメント